Bill Blogs in C# - All Comments

Buy soma online no prescription.

Buy soma online. — Sat, 06 Mar 2010 04:35:35 GMT

Buy soma. Buy soma online. Buy soma online without rx.

VS2010 RC: Much Faster than Beta 2 - Bill Wagner

DotNetShoutout — Mon, 15 Feb 2010 22:30:34 GMT

Thank you for submitting this cool story - Trackback from DotNetShoutout

Social comments and analytics for this post

uberVU - social comments — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 15:47:27 GMT

This post was mentioned on Twitter by Galilyou: RT @billwagner: blogged: VS2010RC much faster than Beta 2. http://bit.ly/ckMO7U

Social comments and analytics for this post

uberVU - social comments — Thu, 04 Feb 2010 23:23:45 GMT

This post was mentioned on Twitter by billwagner: blogged: Euler 14: A reason to Memoize. http://bit.ly/bTMd4l

re: My CodeMash 2010 experience

DA Coffey — Fri, 22 Jan 2010 04:28:05 GMT

I was at CodeMash for the first time and loved it.

I saw your talk and found it very informative.

I think the new dynamic features in 4.0 will definitely reduce some of the painful reflection acrobatics I am forced to do currently in my projects.

My CodeMash 2010 experience

Bill Blogs in C# — Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:52:09 GMT

I have enjoyed reading other posts about how much people enjoyed CodeMash . It is my favorite yearly

re: My CodeMash 2010 Schedule

Dan Terry — Wed, 13 Jan 2010 18:48:27 GMT

Hey Bill... I'm currently making my 2010 CodeMash schedule, and your talk's time block collides with some other interesting presentations. To get to the point, will you be giving your dynamic C# presentation in or around Ann Arbor in the near future?

re: My CodeMash 2010 Schedule

Steve Cadwallader — Mon, 11 Jan 2010 20:35:29 GMT

Had a great time at CodeMash last year and looking forward to it again. I'll be sure to check out your session.

re: It’s time to look ahead to 2010

Pete — Sun, 10 Jan 2010 18:16:17 GMT

The over investment in MBA's as a business tool has certainly hurt a number of companies. Some "very good software companies" need a a good reminder that they are in the business of building software. That being said, there is always a balance here that needs to be met. It will be good to see the balance here return to a level that makes sense.

Is it me...

Chris Shaffer — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 12:43:48 GMT

or do your Conclusions really bring to mind the Unix Philosophy?

en.wikipedia.org/.../Unix_philosophy

re: It’s time to look ahead to 2010

Jack — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 04:47:50 GMT

VS 2010 give us lots of improvement indeed~~

re: It’s time to look ahead to 2010

F. Andy Seidl — Fri, 01 Jan 2010 01:14:10 GMT

Great predictions! I'm pretty much with you but think the paradigm shift to the "small piece, loosely joined" architectures will be a little longer in the works (before it becomes the norm, anyway). We--as an industry--have been heading that way for few years. As much as I'm ready for it, legacy systems (and mindsets) have more inertia than we generally realize.

It’s time to look ahead to 2010

Bill Blogs in C# — Fri, 01 Jan 2010 00:23:02 GMT

Before I discuss my 2010 predictions, it’s important to provide a disclaimer using my 2009 predictions

re: Effective C#, 2nd Edition: What Content got dropped, and why?

buy strattera — Sun, 13 Dec 2009 19:17:24 GMT

this is a cool news. Thank you.

re: I Think Silverlight just ate WPF from the inside

Olivier — Sun, 29 Nov 2009 16:59:43 GMT

WPF has never took off, it is unfortunately the truth. As a MVP, as a WPF lover and evangelist, this situation is not making me happy. But that's the truth and our job is asking us to pay a great attention to the reality. IT often see the world as they dream it and not as it is...

What I saw since a few years now is that WPF is not used, but there is a good buzz around Silverlight.

Myself, I was surprised to realize that when I open a test project under VS or Blend, I prefer to create a new Silverlight project than a WPF one... Why ? dunno.. How a subset can be more exiting that the whole thing ? Total mystery. But this is the reality.

So I think you're right, the future of Xaml as a name, only one name : Silverlight. Because today, if Xaml is alive it is just because SL exists...

Of course the need for desktop apps will always exist and therefore this "Silverlight of the future" will be able to create both web and desktop apps. But I'm pretty sure both SL and WPF will merged in the future in one solution. And the name will not be WPF/E nor WPF, but Silverlight, that's almost sure.

On the other side I don't want people to think I'm sad, on the contrary : I'm happy ! Silverlight is fantastic. And what we are saying is not that WPF will die, just that the "name" and the technologie called WPF will be merged in one technologie named Silverligth.

Viva Xaml, Viva Silverlight ! :-)